“In Maharashtra, besides the Brahman it is the Maratha who claimed to be the ruling community in the villages, and the Prabhu, that dominated all other communities”. After the enforcement of the Constitution of India, the President of India in exercise of power under Article 240 appointed a Commission to investigate the conditions of all such socially and educationally backward classes, the first National Commission for backward classes did not find Maratha as other backward class community in the State of Bombay and stated,.The “Maratha” is a Hindu community which mainly resides in the State of Maharashtra.Nageswara Rao also wrote a separate opinion.
Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta agreed with Justice Ravindra Bhat’s opinion on Question Numbers 4, 5 and 6. While all judges agreed with the opinion of Justice Bhushan on Question Numbers 1, 2 and 3, Justice L. WhetherArticle 342A of the Constitution abrogates States power to legislate or classify in respect of “any backward class of citizens” and thereby affects the federal policy / structure of the Constitution of India?].Whether State’s power to legislate in relation to “any backward class” under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) is anyway abridged by Article 342(A) read with Article 366(26c) of the Constitution of India?.Whether the Constitution 102nd Amendment deprives the State Legislature of its power to enact a legislation determining the socially and economically backward classes and conferring the benefits on the said community under its enabling power?.Gaikwad has made out a case of existence of extraordinary situation and exceptional circumstances in the State to fall within the exception carved out in the judgment of Indra Sawhney? Whether the State Government on the strength of Maharashtra State Backward Commission Report chaired by M.C.Whether the 2018 Act as amended in 2019 granting 12% and 13% reservation for Maratha community in addition to 50% social reservation is covered by exceptional circumstances as contemplated by Constitution Bench in Indra Sawhney’s case?.Union of India needs to be referred to larger bench? Whether judgment in case of Indra Sawhney v.Ravindra Bhat, JJ has quashed the much in debate Maratha Reservation and has held that the Maharashtra State Reservation (of seats for admission in educational institutions in the State and for appointments in the public services and posts under the State) for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018 as amended in 2019 granting 12% and 13% reservation for Maratha community in addition to 50% social reservation is not covered by exceptional circumstances as contemplated by Constitution Bench in Indra Sawhney ’s case. Every part of India has its unique jewellery, the expertise to create those exist only in that region, passed on through generations.Supreme Court: In a big development, the 5-judge bench of Ashok Bhushan, S.A. Wheelchair Accessible Parking Lot: Yes Wheelchair Accessible Elevator: Yes About us Saint Vincent and the Grenadines +1 784.Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan Da Cunha +290.
0 kommentar(er)
